Ir al contenido principal

La Lista de OFAC


La red de empresas que se dedica a "blanquear" el dinero proveniente de actividades del narcotráfico operan a plena vista de las autoridades mexicanas y su desmantelamiento resulta más difícil que capturar a los líderes de los cárteles, consideran autoridades de Estados Unidos, reportó el diario estadounidense The New York Times.
Ranchos, casas de empeño, joyerías, casas de cambio e incluso una pista de carreras, son algunos de los negocios tras los cuales se "esconden" las ganancias de los cárteles de la droga en México y cuyos dueños, a pesar de estar completamente identificados por autoridades estadounidenses, viven y operan sus negocios abiertamente en territorio mexicano.
"Que vengan y me investiguen. No tengo nada que ocultar", asevera Hugo Cuéllar Hurtado, empresario que ha sido señalado como traficante de cocaína y colaborador de Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán pero que, a diferencia del líder del Cártel de Sinaloa, goza de plena libertad e incluso presume de su buena relación con el gobierno mexicano.
Otro de los empresarios que ha sido vinculado al lavado de dinero proveniente del narcotráfico es Joel López, quien afirma que erróneamente el Departamento de Estado de Estados Unidos lo identifica como el colaborador de Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada.

"Se presumen muchas cosas aquí en Sinaloa, así que todos los empresarios como yo, estamos expuestos a la posibilidad de ser vinculados al crimen organizado", asegura López.
Aún y cuando autoridades estadounidenses y mexicanas han colaborado de manera conjunta para cerrarle el paso al narcotráfico y dicho trabajo ha derivado en capturas de líderes como "El Chapo" Guzmán, la cooperación bilateral se desmorona al tratar de desmantelar las redes empresariales de los cárteles, ya que el Gobierno de México da "poco seguimiento de los negocios turbios", afirma la publicación.
"No se le pone el suficiente énfasis como para convertirlo en una prioridad", asegura Alonzo Peña, exsubdirector de Inmigración y Aduanas, en cuanto al desmantelamiento de las redes de lavado.
Por su parte, un "alto funcionario mexicano", asegura que la evidencia que presenta Estados Unidos sobre empresarios supuestamente dedicados a "blanquear" el dinero proveniente del narcotráfico, no tiene el nivel suficiente para realizar decomisos.
El investigador del Instituto México del Centro Wilson, Eric L. Olson, asevera que es difícil lograr una afectación a las finanzas de una operación global, como lo son los cárteles de la droga en México.
"Una cosa es ir tras una empresa individual como un taller de reparación de calzado en Querétaro, pero desmantelar toda la organización como las operaciones del Cártel de Sinaloa es algo global", asegura Olson.
Guadalajara, Jalisco y Culiacán, Sinaloa, son territorios que dependen y se mantienen de dos pilares económicos: los centros agrícolas y del contrabando de drogas, indica el diario estadounidense.
"La ciudad se mantiene a flote por el dinero del narco. Los restaurantes, los spas, los centros comerciales, las distribuidoras de autos de lujo, los condominios no corresponden a la vida diaria de los sinaloenses. Todo se debe a la presencia del narco", indica Javier Valdez Cárdenas, fundador de Riodoce, diario publicado en Culiacán.
La nota del NYT
Vast Web Hides Mexican Drug Profits in Plain Sight, U.S. Authorities Say/By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLDMARCH 25, 2014
TLAJOMULCO, Mexico — The United States calls Hugo Cuéllar Hurtado a longtime trafficker of the cocaine coming from South America, working with one of the men believed to command Mexico’s biggest drug cartel now that its leader, Joaquín Guzmán Loera, has been captured.
But while Mr. Guzmán — known as El Chapo, or Shorty — spent 13 years on the run, sometimes even escaping through underground tunnels dug under bathrooms, Mr. Cuéllar walks freely around Guadalajara, attending luncheons and chatting up diplomats. He says he even won a government grant for an ostrich farm he runs here.
“Let them come and investigate me,” he said leisurely over a breakfast of ostrich steaks and sausages at his 57-acre ranch, which the Treasury Department just designated a money-laundering pit for Mr. Guzmán’s Sinaloa cartel. “I have nothing to hide.”
Over the last seven years the U.S. Treasury Department has designated more than 400 people and entities as part of or affiliated with the Sinaloa cartel. Once sanctions have been imposed, American citizens, banks and companies are prohibited from doing business with them.
Hugo Cuéllar Hurtado, five family members and one associate were recently sanctioned.
Source: Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury
Many of the people and companies suspected of forming the cartel’s extensive money-laundering network continue to operate, even though they appear, as Mr. Cuéllar just did, on the American government’s so-called kingpin list of cartel operatives and their associates.
Like Mr. Cuéllar, businesspeople accused of working with the cartel live openly here and elsewhere in Mexico, despite American assertions that they are helping to hide billions in illicit profits through an intricate web of ranches, pawnshops, jewelry stores, money exchanges, a racetrack, even a day care center that hummed with the comings and goings of children on a recent afternoon. The day care center was added to the sanctions list seven years ago.
While American and Mexican authorities have conducted some joint investigations and seizures, the kind of close collaboration that led to the capture of Mr. Guzmán last month often breaks down when it comes to dismantling the cartel’s financial backbone. American officials say that they identify suspects based on intelligence from drug, customs and immigration agents, but that to their great frustration there is too little follow-through in Mexico to pursue shady businesses and their owners.
 “There is not enough emphasis there on making it a priority,” said Alonzo Peña, a former deputy director at Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “It took the U.S. a long time to focus on money. For a long time, it was ‘Let’s just go after the drugs.’ The U.S. has evolved,” he added, while “Mexico is a little behind the curve and has not made as much of a shift from drugs to money.”
 Mexico has new laws to fight money-laundering, but a senior Mexican official said the evidence the United States presents often does not rise to a level that would allow property seizures or arrests under Mexican law.
 “It’s one thing to designate; it’s another to give proof,” the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity in order to go beyond official talking points.
 Michael S. Vigil, a former chief of global operations at the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, said that when Mexico seized property and assets, they were often returned under a judge’s order, through loopholes exploited by cartel lawyers.
 Continue reading the main story
“There has to be a motivation and willingness to work together and go after the assets,” Mr. Vigil said. “The only thing that hurts the traffickers is when you take away their money and property.”
 Few people have gone to prison or have had their businesses shut down as a result of the American sanctioning. Instead, analysts said, it functions more as a scarlet letter that can complicate finances by prohibiting American banks, companies and citizens from doing business with them, making cross-border banking difficult and chasing away some legitimate investors.
 “The U.S. operations and designations are pretty unilateral,” said Eric L. Olson, a scholar at the Wilson Center’s Mexico Institute. But Mexican officials “don’t have to go along” with the American enforcement actions, he noted.
 Even when nations work together, “the ability to shut down the finances of a global operation is pretty difficult,” Mr. Olson said. “It’s one thing to go after an individual business like a shoe repair shop in Querétaro, but to dismantle the overall organization like the Sinaloa operation is global.”
 Guadalajara and Culiacán, the capital of Sinaloa State, which both lie in agricultural hubs along drug smuggling routes, are places where Mr. Guzmán is believed to have hidden his cash.
 “The city is kept afloat by narco money,” said Javier Valdez Cárdenas, founder of Ríodoce, a newspaper in Culiacán. “The amount of bistros, restaurants, spas, shopping malls, luxury car dealerships, condos — it does not correspond to the life of everyday Sinaloans. It’s the narco presence.”
The senior Mexican official declined to comment on Mr. Cuéllar’s case, refusing to say whether his assets were being investigated. Mr. Cuéllar is not known to face criminal charges in Mexico or in the United States, though such charges may be filed under seal and made public later.
The Culiacán auto racing track landed on the Treasury Department’s list in 2011 as a cartel asset. It continues to operate and had a healthy crowd on a recent night for its weekly “arrancones,” or drag racing.
Joel López, who said he opened the track in 2006, contended that the Treasury Department had wrongly identified a lieutenant of Ismael Mario Zambada — known as El Mayo, another man believed to be a possible successor to Mr. Guzmán — as the controlling investor behind it.
“I am a businessman, and I have nothing to hide,” Mr. López said. “A lot of things are presumed here in Sinaloa, so all the businessmen like myself are exposed to the possibility of being linked to organized crime.”
The exact ownership and profitability of businesses are often difficult to discern. A dairy called Santa Monica, which the United States says is a reservoir for the cartel’s dirty money, had no products available at the largest grocery chain in Culiacán, its home base. In a supermarket where the brand was found, only one product, whole milk, was for sale, compared with an array of milks, cheeses and yogurts from other brands.
At the dairy’s unmarked plant on a highway outside Culiacán, workers said there were no representatives available to talk. At a small administrative office in town, across from an abandoned Santa Monica plant, a receptionist likewise said no owner or manager was available. No one answered a message left there.
Mr. Cuéllar landed on the sanctions list five days after the capture of Mr. Guzmán, part of what American officials call a renewed effort to tighten the financial noose on the cartel. Mr. Cuéllar complained that he now stands to lose American customers and perhaps some Mexican ones, without due process.
Still, his 30-odd workers kept busy, tending the Friesian horses he keeps, feeding a new batch of ostrich chicks and carving meat at the ranch’s processing plant. A grant from the Mexican agriculture department in 2011 helped modernize the facilities, according to Mr. Cuéllar and Mexican newspaper accounts. 
Mr. Cuéllar, a Colombian-Mexican, says he is the victim of guilt by association with a childhood friend, Leonidas Vargas Vargas, a Colombian drug lord shot to death in 2009 while serving a 19-year sentence for narcotics trafficking in Spain
 “That is the only thing I can think of, that they think I have some link with that guy,” he said.
 Five of Mr. Cuéllar’s relatives also face Treasury sanctions, including a son, John Fredy Cuéllar, and a daughter-in-law, Gabriela Amarillas López. Ms. Amarillas is the daughter of Sinaloa State’s under secretary for finance, Gildardo Amarillas López, who has denied any connections to drug trafficking.
 If Mr. Cuéllar’s ranch suffers from the American sanctions, he said, he will probably sell it and do something else — another limit of the sanctions. He said he was already considering liquidating some of his assets.
 “I guess I would have to find another business,” he said.
 Correction: March 25, 2014
 An earlier version of this article misspelled the surname of a son of Hugo Cuéllar Hurtado. He is John Fredy Cuéllar, not Cuéller.
 Paulina Villegas contributed reporting from Mexico City.
 A version of this article appears in print on March 26, 2014, on page A4 of the New York edition with the headline: Vast Web Hides Mexican Drug Profits in Plain Sight, U.S. Authorities Say. Order Reprints|Today's Paper|Subscribe

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

AMLO perdió la calma y se desbordó contra sus aliados..

El C. Presidente convocó la tarde del jueves 7 de noviembre en Palacio Nacional a los diputados federales y senadores de Morena para evaluar avances de la agenda legislativa.
Fueron convocados también legisladores aliados como PES, PT e incluso el PVEM, nueva adquisición de la 4T.
"Es una reunión para la revisión de la agenda legislativa, que normalmente tenemos dos o tres veces al año con el Presidente, antes de iniciar las sesiones y en el trayecto del periodo de sesiones", indicó Ricardo Monreal, coordinador de los senadores de Morena.
Los primero en llegar fueron los representantes del PES;  Tatiana Clouthier indicó que desconocía el motivo de la reunión, pues sólo fue convocada.
Incluso rechazó que se un llamado del Presidente para darles línea, pues la línea es que no hay línea.
Al final el Presidente salió molestó incluso sin despedirse,  entre chiflidos de los inconformes.
Y es que los trato de corruptos....habráse visto!
¿Imagínense si se hubiera transmitido ese “dialogo c…

Y ahora la 4T pretende criminalizar a juzgadores. ¿Qué dice la SCJN?

Contrareforma en materia de justicia penal!Y ahora los de la 4T van contra jueces y magistrados/ opinión de un amigo penalista, que circula en redes...Muy oportuno...
Así como en 2019 los presentados como los nuevos y grandes delincuentes fueron los factureros y las empresas fantasma; hoy los nuevos delincuentes son los jueces y magistrados federales, SI, así se les trata en la propuesta de reforma constitucional de La FGN. Para ellos, se va a crear un tribunal especial que les juzgue conformado por jueces NOMBRADOS POR EL SENADO y por ello, por aliados políticos, obviamente comprometidos “VENDIDOS” con SU PARTIDO. Las cuotas para nombrarlos se dividirán. 
El grupo mayoritario tendrá más JUECES POLÍTICOS, y estos por su designación y por LEY responderán ante el Senado.
¡Que tragedia de país!
Me pregunto: ¿tiene esto el aval de la SCJN? Esas propuestas tienen el aval de la Corte?
Volvamos a los JUECES Y MAGISTRADOS de nuestro país señalados cómo DELINCUENTES al menos de forma probable. 
¿Que…

Oaxaca, la fotografía…, elección cerrada; 34 y 30%

Encuesta / Registra tricolor mínima ventaja Encuesta REFORMA. Elecciones Oaxaca.  Alcanza Murat 34% de las preferencias frente al 30% de Estefan Garfias Nota de Lorena Becerra y Joaquín Zambrano Reforma, Pp, 26 de mayo de 2016
Alejandro Murat, candidato del PRI-PVEM-PANAL, supera por escasos cuatro puntos a José Antonio Estefan Garfias, abanderado del PRD-PAN, rumbo a la elección para Gobernador de Oaxaca que se llevará a cabo el próximo 5 de junio. Dado el margen de error del estudio, esto se traduce en un empate técnico entre ambos candidatos. Así lo revela una encuesta de REFORMA a mil electores en la entidad. Los dos punteros gozan de buenos niveles de reconocimiento de nombre. No obstante, Estefan cuenta con una imagen positiva entre los entrevistados, en contraste con el candidato del tricolor que recibe más opiniones negativas que positivas. Por su parte, el aspirante de MORENA, Salomón Jara, no es conocido por el 58 por ciento de la población, pero aun así logra posicionarse en terce…