El gobierno del presidente Enrique Peña Nieto presentó
estadísticas que mostrarían una disminución de diciembre a enero de los hechos
violentos presuntamente relacionados con el crimen organizado en México, aunque
analistas cuestionan la veracidad de los datos, toda vez que no se mencionan
investigaciones judiciales concretas, afirmó ayer martes 19 de febrero el diario The New York Times.
En
un reportaje, el rotativo revela que el programa de prevención del delito
presentado la semana pasada, que incluye la creación de una comisión
interinstitucional con una inversión de nueve mil millones de dólares los
próximos años en las 250 ciudades y pueblos más violentos, es similar al puesto
en marcha por el expresidente Felipe Calderón en Ciudad Juárez.
También
refiere críticas al programa por no atacar la corrupción. No veo nada en sus
casi tres primeros meses que muestre que se está atacando a la impunidad,
señaló Edgardo Buscaglia, experto en delincuencia organizada de la Universidad
de Columbia.
El
diario expone que Guerrero representa un desafío para la presente
administración, luego de la violación de turistas españolas, la emboscada que
mató a nueve policías estatales y el surgimiento de policías comunitarias.
La
frustración porque el Estado no los está protegiendo, originó que pueblos
rurales de Guerrero tomaran las armas y asumieran la policía, expone el diario.
También
destaca que, en otros lugares, granadas detonaron este mes cerca del consulado
de Estados Unidos en la ciudad fronteriza de Nuevo Laredo durante una batalla
entre pandillas y, además, 17 miembros del grupo musical Kombo Kolombia, fueron
secuestrados y asesinados en enero.
Destaca
que el apetito de los grupos criminales por la violencia no parece cesar y
representa un desafío para el presidente: ¿Podrá manejar el tema y evitar ser
arrastrado hacia la percepción de mano dura de su predecesor y, además, cambiar
el foco de la discusión nacional a otros asuntos, como la economía?, pregunta
el rotativo en el texto.
Están
tratando de que el presidente no utilice el tema de la delincuencia como su
prioridad política, señaló al diario Ana María Salazar, analista de seguridad
que trabajó en el Departamento de Estado.
Y
añadió: No han presentado lo que van a hacer en el corto plazo para retomar el
territorio mexicano y quitarle el control de las organizaciones criminales.
The
New York Times concluye que las autoridades de Estados Unidos le están dando
tiempo al nuevo presidente para que integre su equipo, antes de evaluar cómo
trabajarán juntos respecto a la Iniciativa Mérida.
El reportaje:
NYT February
18, 2013
Unabated
Violence Poses Challenge to Mexico’s New Anticrime Program
By
RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD
MEXICO
CITY — The new Mexican president, Enrique Peña Nieto, campaigned on a promise
to reduce the violence spawned by the drug trade and organized crime, and to
shift the talk about his nation away from cartels and killings.
But
even as he rolled out a crime prevention program last week and declared it the
government’s new priority, a rash of high-profile mayhem threatened to undercut
his message and raise the pressure to more forcefully confront the lawlessness
that bedeviled his predecessor.
The
southwestern state of Guerrero, long prone to periodic eruptions of violence,
has proved a challenge once again. Gang rapes of several women have occurred in
and around the faded resort town of Acapulco, including an attack this month on
a group from Spain that garnered worldwide headlines, and an ambush killed nine
state police officers in a mountainous no-man’s land. Out of frustration that
the state was not protecting them, rural towns in Guerrero have taken up arms
to police themselves.
Elsewhere,
grenades were set off this month near the United States Consulate in the border
town of Nuevo Laredo during a battle among gangs, and 17 members of Kombo
Kolombia, a folk band in northern Mexico, were kidnapped and killed last month.
The
bloodshed continued despite some indications that the violence leveled off last
year, according to a report released on Feb. 5 by the University of San Diego’s
Trans-Border Institute, which analyzed a range of government homicide
statistics. Mr. Peña Nieto’s government also released statistics this month
that it said showed that homicides presumably related to organized crime had
dipped from December to January, but analysts have long questioned how those
numbers were compiled, given the chronic lack of criminal investigations.
Still,
the appetite of criminal groups for shocking violence seems unabated and
presents a challenge for the president. Can he manage to avoid being drawn into
the iron-fisted approach of his predecessor and effectively change the focus of
the national discussion to other matters, like the economy?
“They
are trying to have the president not use the crime issue as his political
priority,” said Ana Maria Salazar, a security analyst who worked in the
American government and now hosts a radio show here. “But at the same time, it
doesn’t seem what they are talking about is confronting or going to have an
impact on the current violence and criminal organizations.”
She
added, “They haven’t laid out what they are going to do in the short term to
retake Mexican territory in control of criminal organizations.”
Government
officials have asked for patience, saying Mexico’s crime problems cannot be
solved overnight.
They
have made it clear that they want to break with the approach of former
President Felipe Calderón, who heavily enlisted the military and the federal
police against crime gangs, but the new government has taken a similar tack in
recent flare-ups, including sending a cadre of federal police officers to
Acapulco after the attacks there. Government officials have pledged closer
coordination between the federal police and the state authorities.
Officials
are promoting the less militaristic crime prevention program introduced last
week as a linchpin, with Mr. Peña Nieto personally announcing it and Interior
Secretary Miguel Ángel Osorio Chong briefing reporters extensively on it. On
Thursday, an under secretary presented a slick brochure on the program to
foreign journalists and answered questions for 45 minutes.
“It’s
clear that we must put special emphasis on prevention, because we can’t only
keep employing more sophisticated weapons, better equipment, more police, a
higher presence of the armed forces in the country as the only form of
combating organized crime,” Mr. Peña Nieto said in announcing the program in
Aguascalientes, one of the more peaceful precincts in the country.
The
program calls for creating an interagency commission that would spend $9
billion in the coming years in 250 of the most violent cities and towns,
beginning with the worst. The plan envisions longer school days, drug addiction
programs and other social efforts in addition to public works projects, but
officials said specifics were still being worked out and would be detailed
later.
It
resembles a plan Mr. Calderón put in place a few years ago for Ciudad Juárez,
one of the bloodiest cities in Mexico, but government officials said that while
they studied that project, they believed that their plan differed in ambition
and scope.
Few
argue with the need for such programs and alternatives to crime for young
people. But security analysts faulted Mr. Calderón for not attacking corruption
by building effective, accountable local and state police and judicial
institutions, a herculean task that Mr. Peña Nieto so far has not shown much
sign of taking on either.
“I
do not see anything in his nearly first three months that show he is taking on
impunity,” said Edgardo Buscaglia, a scholar of organized crime at Columbia
University who has long studied Mexico and advised international panels.
Animal
Politico, the political Web site, went as far as to post a discussion last week
on whether Acapulco is lost and Guerrero a failed state, with most comments
pointing to chronically weak institutions there that the administration has yet
to address.
“The
authorities should attack the root of the problem: the lack of efficient
response from the institutions for security, investigation and imparting
justice,” said Carlos Heredia Zubieta, the director of international studies at
the Center for Research and Teaching in Economics, a research group in Mexico
City.
Some
experts saw the rollout of the crime prevention program, with government
officials’ acknowledgment that it was still a work in progress, as more of a
public relations move in the middle of a wave of violence than a well-crafted
plan.
“It
is not a program,” said Alejandro Hope, a security analyst and former Mexican
intelligence agent. “It is generic instructions launched from the
stratosphere.”
Mr.
Peña Nieto has made other promises to improve security, including forming a
paramilitary unit to police the worst of the lawless rural areas, but he has
yet to announce details.
Some
of the delay no doubt stems from the fact that nominees to main security posts
have yet to be ratified by the country’s Senate. On Thursday, the names of two
top security officials expected to be involved in forming the new unit were
formally submitted to the body.
American
officials have so far hung back, giving the new president time to get his team
in place before assessing how well they will work together. Representatives of
Mr. Peña Nieto said they were in talks with American officials to discuss using
some of the $1.9 billion in the Mérida Initiative, Washington’s signature
antidrug plan for crime prevention in Central America. The United States
Embassy said in a statement Friday that it already supported crime prevention
programs, but that it was continuing to discuss Mérida financing with the new
government.
Guerrero
presents a microcosm of the nation’s problems as whole. There is the typical
drug trafficking, as the state is crossed by traditional transport routes for
cocaine from South America, and its mountainous terrain allows for plenty of
hiding spots for marijuana and poppy production. But there are also many local
gangs active in drug dealing, extortion, kidnapping and robbery in and around
Acapulco, and as residents tell it, they are seeping into smaller villages as
well.
“Part
of the problem here is that there are different types of violence going on, and
each require a different sort of response,” said Chris Kyle, an anthropologist
at the University of Alabama at Birmingham who has studied Guerrero’s violence.
“There’s probably been a decline in the violence associated with drug
trafficking, which is the part of the equation most amenable to a federal
solution. The street hooliganism and small kidnapping-extortion rackets are
better addressed by local police forces, and these are ineffectual in
Guerrero.”
This
article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction:
February 19, 2013
An
earlier version of this article referred incompletely to Chris Kyle’s academic
affiliation. He is an anthropologist at the University of Alabama at
Birmingham; the University of Alabama’s flagship campus is in Tuscaloosa.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario