How
Pope Francis can win back the West and secure his church’s future/Patrick Hornbeck is chair and associate professor in the department of theology at Fordham University, where he teaches and writes on the history of Christianity. He holds a doctorate from Oxford University and is author or editor of five books.
Reuters
| 21/09/15
When
Pope Francis arrives in the United States Tuesday, he will encounter three
broad groups of Catholics. There are those who feel energized about his papacy,
those who harbor concern about his style and his agenda, and those who are
disinterested and disaffected — many to the point of leaving the church.
The
success of the pope’s trip will depend in large part on how he communicates
with each of these groups. To those who celebrate the change in tone he has
brought to the papacy, he will need to show that he has also heard their calls
for changes in substance. To those for whom he represents a dangerous break
with tradition, he will need to show that he is not about change for its own
sake, but for the sake of God’s love and mercy. And to those who are
disaffected, Francis will need to give a reason not just for respect and
admiration but also for re-engagement.
Francis’
visit — his first trip ever to the United States — comes at a moment when U.S.
Catholics are as divided as most other Americans on the major issues of the
day. Recent polls confirm that Catholics are split on same-sex marriage,
although a majority of them favor it and only a few support religious liberty
exemptions to nondiscrimination laws. They are also divided on abortion,
immigration, environmental issues, economic inequality, and (not least)
partisan politics. Pope Francis will therefore be walking a pastoral tightrope,
seeking ways to challenge and reassure Catholics at all points on the
ideological spectrum.
Repeatedly
in the past two and a half years, many Catholics who have applauded the pope
for his seemingly progressive statements have asked whether Francis will take
the next step and change the church’s doctrine as well as its tone. These
Catholics, joined by many members of the global media, look to Francis as
someone who might, just might, enshrine in church teachings a greater welcome
for gay and lesbian people, for the divorced and remarried, and for others on
the church’s margins.
But
if the yardstick progressives use to measure Francis’s papacy is doctrinal
change, they will no doubt be disappointed. Historically, popes have rarely
made doctrinal innovations entirely on their own initiative, and Francis is no
exception. He has described himself as “a son of the church” and has affirmed,
even if less stridently than previous popes, traditional positions on issues
like abortion and same-sex marriage.
For
Francis, who unlike his two most recent predecessors does not hold a doctorate
in theology, it appears that the minutiae of doctrine take second place to the
ways in which the church lives out its teachings, especially in its ministries
to the vulnerable. He has spent his time as pope emphasizing that the church
should become a “field hospital” where people encounter the mercy of God and
experience conversion in their hearts. It is reasonable to expect that he will
continue to make (and push others to make) administrative changes that make the
church’s ministries more accessible to all its members, especially those who
have not always felt welcome. But doctrinal change is a longer-term, often
messy process for which Francis may not have much enthusiasm.
With
those of his flock who view him suspiciously, Francis has an opposite and
likely more difficult challenge: to reassure them that despite his innovations
on procedural matters like annulments, the change of style that he has brought
to the papacy does not presage more radical, theological reform. The opposition
that Francis has encountered from traditionalist churchmen on relatively minor
issues is, in recent history, unprecedented. Few would have dared to criticize
previous popes as openly as some, like U.S. cardinal Raymond Burke, who have
said that they intend to “resist” changes that would liberalize the church.
Whether Francis can win over such skeptics remains an open question, for they
have often criticized him for preferring pastoral care over doctrinal clarity.
However,
from the perspective of the church’s long history, a split between reformers
and traditionalists is nothing new. While the tone Francis has brought to the
papacy has sharpened pre-existing divisions and given new hope to those on the
ecclesial left, perhaps more important than any of the church’s internal
debates is the number of Catholics who have left the church altogether. A
recent Pew study shows that former Catholics outnumber new converts six to one.
Indeed, more than one in eight American adults is a former Catholic.
What
can Pope Francis do to win back the hearts and minds of those who have walked
away from the church? Two and a half years into his papacy, it is clear that
Americans have warmer views toward the church than they did before his
election. But the much-vaunted “Francis effect,” which some predicted would
translate positive feelings into higher attendance at Sunday Mass, has mostly
failed to materialize. Former Catholics have by and large not returned, but
many still grieve their departure from the church, and not a few struggle to
find a new religious home.
To
connect with those who would consider returning, Francis will need to do at
least two things. First, double down on his pastoral emphasis on the love and
mercy of God, finding ways to convey a message of hope and break through the
ideological clashes that are toxic to so many. And then second, address head-on
the issues that led some to decide to leave. The pope will need to confront the
heartbreak, betrayal, and anger that many still feel at the church’s handling of
the abuse of children by its priests. He will need to show that he understands
the pain that many church leaders have caused LGBT people, their friends and
family members. And he will need to speak about women in a way that makes them
feel heard and welcomed.
Unfortunately
for this optimistic, energetic pope, no such initiative may be enough, and
steps in the direction of a more radical welcome will surely cost him among the
traditional members of his flock.
In
his travels abroad, Pope Francis has shown a knack for gestures that allow him
to connect with others. Praying at the wall dividing Israel from the West Bank.
Driving through the crowded streets of Rio de Janeiro. Visiting an overcrowded
prison in Bolivia. It remains to be seen what the pope has in store for
Washington, New York, and Philadelphia, but as he comes to the United States
for the first time, he will be hard-pressed to satisfy everyone he will
encounter. Yet, if he is to secure the long-term health of the Catholic Church
in this country, he will need to speak to those who have left as much as to
those who have stayed.
Patrick
Hornbeck is chair and associate professor in the department of theology at
Fordham University, where he teaches and writes on the history of Christianity.
He holds a doctorate from Oxford University and is author or editor of five
books.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario