Islamic
State’s horrible healing power in Egypt/Nina Shea is director of Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom and coauthor of Persecuted: The Global Assault on Christians.
Los
Angeles Times | 20/-2/15
Relatives of Egyptian Coptic Christians killed by Islamic State militants in Libya react after hearing the news. (Mohamed El-Shahed / AFP/Getty Images)
The
horror in Libya could have come from a Hieronymus Bosch painting of hell: 21
knife-wielding figures hacking the heads off 21 young men in orange jumpsuits
along the shoreline, blood staining the surf red. But this was no imagined
scene — it was the mass execution of Egyptian Copts who had been kidnapped by
Islamic State terrorists.
The
killers may have aimed to exploit sectarian hostilities — as they have in Iraq
and Syria — and splinter Egyptian society. Paradoxically, however, this
blatantly anti-Christian attack may finally lead to the easing of
Christian-Muslim tensions in Egypt.
This
week, Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah Sisi responded to the beheadings with acts
that unequivocally recognized the Copts as “innocent victims” and true sons of
Egypt. He declared a week of national mourning, dispatched envoys to appeal to
the United Nations and ordered air force bombers to “deliver swift justice in
retribution.”
Sisi’s
visit to St. Mark’s Cathedral to offer condolences to Pope Tawadros II, the
head of the Coptic Orthodox Church in Cairo, was another welcome gesture of
solidarity.
Whatever
the strategic value of Sisi’s moves, his display of respect is precisely what
Copts have been yearning for.
The
Copts, whose name is derived from the Greek word for Egypt, trace their faith
to St. Mark, the Gospel writer, thus predating Islam in Egypt by 600 years.
Nevertheless, Egypt’s state policies and practices have long treated the
Christian minority as second-class citizens, if not a foreign fifth column.
Persecution
of the Copts intensified in the final years of Hosni Mubarak’s presidency, then
escalated after the “Arab Spring” revolution. When the Muslim Brotherhood
gained control of the government in 2012, tens of thousands of Copts sought
refuge abroad.
A
2011 episode in Cairo’s Maspero district became an iconic example of anti-Copt
persecution. People protesting a string of church arsons were ruthlessly
dispersed by the military. More than two dozen were killed and hundreds wounded
after being shot at or run over by police in tanks, according to forensic
reports. Afterward, the government exonerated the security forces, arresting
instead two dozen Copts and a sympathetic Muslim, who were jailed for months.
The prime minister blamed the violence on “invisible hands,” insinuating some
American and Israeli influence. The investigation of the incident was
eventually closed for lack of evidence.
Other
lethal attacks that garnered international attention include the 2010 drive-by
shooting that killed seven worshipers at the Orthodox Christmas Mass in the
town of Nag Hamadi; the 2011 bombing of Alexandria’s Two Saints Church during a
New Year’s service that killed at least 21; and the 2013 mob attack at St.
Mark’s Cathedral during a funeral for five Copts slain in reprisal for alleged
blasphemy. But most assaults occur outside the major cities, away from the
public eye.
Incited
by state-supported media and imams, mobs attack Copts and their churches for
any number of perceived wrongs — blasphemy against Islam, interfaith romance.
But frequently the trigger is a law carried over from Ottoman rule that sharply
restricts where and how Christian churches can be built or repaired. More than
just some vestigial rule, the law has been brutally enforced as a way to subordinate
Copts. On one day in 2011, armed forces directed heavy machine-gun fire at two
Coptic monasteries, ostensibly to address zoning problems. A few months before,
police shot at Copts repairing the roof of St. Mary Church in Giza, killing
four, and then arrested 200 keeping vigil inside.
This
persecution has been compounded by flawed or nonexistent justice. Even if
perpetrators are charged, courts resolve matters not with a legal judgment but
with “reconciliation sessions” in which the victimized Copt is forced to shake
hands with his Muslim aggressor.
Anti-Copt
hate crimes are still reported daily. But the last major attack was in
mid-August 2013, after the overthrow of President Mohamed Morsi and his Muslim
Brotherhood-dominated government. That military coup was supported by
socialists, women’s rights groups, students, intellectuals, businesspeople,
secularists and the military, but it was Copts who were the scapegoats and bore
the brunt of Islamist anger. Scores of churches were demolished by mobs over three
days of attacks.
President
Sisi, a pious Muslim, should ensure that his recent steps lead to a new chapter
of religious freedom and cultural tolerance in Egypt. He can start by seeing
that those who assault Copts and their property are tried and punished;
journalists and religious leaders who incite such violence are taken off
government payrolls and held responsible; and churches and mosques are given
equal treatment under state zoning and construction regulations.
The
encroachment of extremist militias on the country’s western border poses a
threat to Egypt’s Muslims and Christians alike. It’s in the interest of both to
stand equal and united.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario