Ir al contenido principal

Being in the Stade de France attack was scary. So is France’s future/

Being in the Stade de France attack was scary. So is France’s future/Joel Dreyfuss is a former managing editor of The Root.
The Washington Post | 15/11/15
My wife and I were among the thousands as the nearly-full 80,000-seat Stade de France in Paris for the France-Germany game when a loud explosion behind us interrupted the good-natured cheering in the stands around us about 15 minutes into the match. I thought at first that it was a firecracker — a very big one — because it seemed so close. What I had actually heard was a suicide bomber blowing himself up outside the stadium several hundred yards and several levels below our seats. Two more explosions and two more suicides would follow.
There was no announcement to spectators, and the game went on — although, we learned later, French President François Hollande was quietly evacuated. I couldn’t get onto the Internet on my cellphone, and since most people seemed to stay in their seats I decided it wasn’t a big deal. But my wife noticed that a number of people in our section left at halftime and didn’t return, even though the score was only 1-0 in France’s favor. I finally got a text message during the second half mentioning the explosions at the stadium and the shootings in Paris. The death toll at the time had reached 20, just a fraction of the more than 120 that would result from the coordinated terrorist attacks that hit six sites in the French capital.

We have made Paris our home for the past four years after several decades in New York, and we are acutely aware of its (and our) vulnerability. Just 10 months ago, terrorists killed 12 in an attack on the offices of the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo. Several others were killed a day later in an assault by a gunman on a kosher supermarket.
But if those attacks were motivated by identifiable (and unjustifiable) political or religious reasons, the ones on Friday night are more frightening for their nebulous focus. They were more than reactions to perceived religious insult or expressions of crude anti-Semitism. The targets were diffuse, undifferentiated — random victims selected simply for their availability.
Paris is a compact city compared with New York, and you quickly become familiar with its various neighborhoods. Earlier on Friday, we had lunch at a Korean restaurant not far from the restaurants and the concert hall where the massacres took place. I had been to a concert at the Bataclan a couple of years earlier.
Even more frightening is that France was already on high alert. Some months ago, while researching a book on my Haitian family’s Jewish roots, we took a walking tour of the 9th arrondissement, which adjoins the 10th, where most of the killings took place. In the aftermath of Charlie Hebdo, we were struck by the conspicuous presence of armed soldiers posted at identifiable Jewish institutions, synagogues and media companies.
We have also noticed more careful attention at the borders. On a trip to London last month, our U.S. passports were not enough. For the first time, we were asked to show our residence permits, roughly equivalent to green cards. And on a trip to Florence in the spring, the return night train was halted for several hours at the Swiss border for a check of papers of every passenger on board. A young Arab man and a south Asian man in our six-compartment coach were taken off the train.
There is no guarantee against terrorism. We still love Paris, and we hope that it will regain its exuberant and graceful approach to life. But the major stores are closed today. Authorities have urged Parisians to stay home. A gathering to celebrate a visiting friend has been canceled, as well as a lecture at the Sorbonne I planned to attend. Parisians will inevitably eye each other with heightened suspicion. La belle vie seems more like a wish today than reality.

Comentarios

Entradas más populares de este blog

Alfredo Jalife en la mañanera de hoy

Conferencia de prensa del presidente López Obrador, del 24 de abril de 2019 Versión estenográfica ...
-Buenos días, presidente. Soy Saúl Soltero, del canal de redes sociales El Nopal Times. “....En relación al maestro Alfredo Jalife, que muchas personas pugnan o solicitan que sea incorporado en su gobierno por ser un excelente analista, un geoestratega que tiene muchas ideas de cómo podría México transitar a ser un país exitoso. ¿Qué opina usted de esa petición de que sea tomado en cuenta dentro de su gobierno para ocupar algún cargo? PRESIDENTE :  Acerca de lo de Jalife. Es una muy buena persona. No creo yo que quiera ocupar un cargo, es un analista, un investigador; pero en el caso que hubiese algo que le interesara, como cualquier otro profesional analista, lo tomaríamos en cuenta. No hay veto para Jalife ni para nadie. Hay muchas discrepancias, hay debate, yo lo considero sano; a veces se pasan, pero es sano eso. Ya cuando no se debate es que hay que avisarles que ya se apagó la luz…

AMLO perdió la calma y se desbordó contra sus aliados..

El C. Presidente convocó la tarde del jueves 7 de noviembre en Palacio Nacional a los diputados federales y senadores de Morena para evaluar avances de la agenda legislativa.
Fueron convocados también legisladores aliados como PES, PT e incluso el PVEM, nueva adquisición de la 4T.
"Es una reunión para la revisión de la agenda legislativa, que normalmente tenemos dos o tres veces al año con el Presidente, antes de iniciar las sesiones y en el trayecto del periodo de sesiones", indicó Ricardo Monreal, coordinador de los senadores de Morena.
Los primero en llegar fueron los representantes del PES;  Tatiana Clouthier indicó que desconocía el motivo de la reunión, pues sólo fue convocada.
Incluso rechazó que se un llamado del Presidente para darles línea, pues la línea es que no hay línea.
Al final el Presidente salió molestó incluso sin despedirse,  entre chiflidos de los inconformes.
Y es que los trato de corruptos....habráse visto!
¿Imagínense si se hubiera transmitido ese “dialogo c…

Oaxaca, la fotografía…, elección cerrada; 34 y 30%

Encuesta / Registra tricolor mínima ventaja Encuesta REFORMA. Elecciones Oaxaca.  Alcanza Murat 34% de las preferencias frente al 30% de Estefan Garfias Nota de Lorena Becerra y Joaquín Zambrano Reforma, Pp, 26 de mayo de 2016
Alejandro Murat, candidato del PRI-PVEM-PANAL, supera por escasos cuatro puntos a José Antonio Estefan Garfias, abanderado del PRD-PAN, rumbo a la elección para Gobernador de Oaxaca que se llevará a cabo el próximo 5 de junio. Dado el margen de error del estudio, esto se traduce en un empate técnico entre ambos candidatos. Así lo revela una encuesta de REFORMA a mil electores en la entidad. Los dos punteros gozan de buenos niveles de reconocimiento de nombre. No obstante, Estefan cuenta con una imagen positiva entre los entrevistados, en contraste con el candidato del tricolor que recibe más opiniones negativas que positivas. Por su parte, el aspirante de MORENA, Salomón Jara, no es conocido por el 58 por ciento de la población, pero aun así logra posicionarse en terce…